How returns build on returns, the difference between contributions and growth, and why fees, taxes, and inflation matter.
Direct answers
Compounding means returns generate further returns, so time and consistent contributions matter enormously — but fees, taxes, and inflation quietly reduce the real result.
Key points
Compounding rewards time in the market more than the size of any single contribution.
Early on, your contributions dominate; over decades, growth can exceed contributions.
Nominal returns ignore inflation; real (after-inflation) returns are what buy things.
A 1% annual fee on ¥10m is ~¥100,000 a year before compounding — costs compound too.
These are deterministic illustrations, not forecasts; real returns are irregular.
How compounding works
When an investment earns a return and you keep it invested, next period’s return is calculated on the larger balance. Repeated over years, this snowballs. A one-time ¥1,000,000 invested and left to compound annually would grow to roughly: at 3%, about ¥1.34m after 10 years, ¥1.81m after 20, and ¥2.43m after 30; at 5%, about ¥1.63m / ¥2.65m / ¥4.32m; at 7%, about ¥1.97m / ¥3.87m / ¥7.61m.
The pattern is that higher assumed returns and longer periods both matter, and the later years contribute disproportionately — which is why starting earlier, even with small amounts, is powerful.
Contributions vs investment growth
Monthly investing shows the same effect. At an assumed 5% annual return compounded monthly, investing ¥30,000 at each month-end would produce roughly ¥4.66m after 10 years, ¥12.33m after 20, and ¥24.97m after 30. Your own contributions over those periods total ¥3.6m, ¥7.2m, and ¥10.8m — so in the early years most of the balance is your own money, but by year 30 investment growth exceeds everything you paid in.
This is why persistence beats intensity: continuing a modest amount for decades lets growth do the heavy lifting, whereas stopping and restarting resets the clock.
Fees, taxes, and inflation
Compounding cuts both ways. A 1% annual fee on a ¥10m portfolio is about ¥100,000 in the first year, but because that money is no longer invested, the drag compounds over decades into a much larger sum. This is the core case for low-cost index funds and for tax-free wrappers like NISA, where qualifying gains escape the usual 20.315% Japanese tax.
Finally, distinguish nominal from real returns. A 5% nominal return with 2% inflation is only about 3% in real purchasing power. When planning, label your return as an assumption, and consider the real figure — the one that actually determines what your money can buy.
Who this is for
Beginners deciding how much and how early to invest
People comparing fund costs
What this is not
Anyone treating the illustrations as guaranteed returns
Short-term traders
Important cautions
All figures are deterministic illustrations at assumed rates. Real returns vary year to year and can be negative.
Related products & services
RS
Rakuten Securities楽天証券
Brokerage (NISA/iDeCo) · Rakuten Securities
English support: Partial
A leading low-cost brokerage for NISA and index-fund investing, integrated with Rakuten points and Rakuten Bank.
Broad low-cost index fund and ETF lineup
NISA and iDeCo support
Point integration and easy Rakuten Bank linking
Fees: Many domestic funds and trades are low- or no-commission — verify current fee schedule.
This is education, not a recommendation. Most beginners research low-cost, broadly diversified index funds — for example all-country (全世界株式) or S&P 500 trackers — rather than picking individual stocks, because low fees and diversification are within your control while returns are not. Understand that values fall as well as rise, match the risk to your time horizon, and never invest money you may need soon.